State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Dinkar Sasane Advocate - D. N. Gavade — 246/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(F)(H)(I)(N),504. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHKO010043542022
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2061/2022
Filing Date
21-11-2022
Registration No
246/2022
Registration Date
22-11-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur
FIR Details
FIR Number
257
Police Station
Police Station Gandhinagar
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Sagar Dinkar Sasane Advocate - D. N. Gavade
Hearing History
Judge: 30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 17-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 11-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 09-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 04-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: Bail application of Sagar Dinkar Sasane, accused of sexually abusing his minor daughter (age 14) under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(f)(h)(i), 504 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 8, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused, including positive DNA report, victim's medical examination corroborating her allegations, and pregnancy resulting from the abuse. The court rejected the no-objection affidavits from the mother and grandmother as lacking substance, and found substantial risk of witness tampering and evidence destruction if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail application of Sagar Dinkar Sasane, accused of sexually abusing his minor daughter (age 14) under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(f)(h)(i), 504 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 8, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused, including positive DNA report, victim's medical examination corroborating her allegations, and pregnancy resulting from the abuse. The court rejected the no-objection affidavits from the mother and grandmother as lacking substance, and found substantial risk of witness tampering and evidence destruction if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts