Arun Rajaram More vs Supriya Arun More Advocate - G. K. Ambekar — 139/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO010041142025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-10-2025

Filing Number

1770/2025

Filing Date

13-11-2025

Registration No

139/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

Arun Rajaram More

Adv. IRFAN AKBAR PENDHARI

Respondent(s)

Supriya Arun More Advocate - G. K. Ambekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

16-04-2026

Disposed

13-04-2026

Order

06-04-2026

Hearing

01-04-2026

Hearing

25-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the husband's application to transfer the pending Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) case from Judge V. M. Kolekar to another judge at Jaysingpur, accepting his concern that a potential conflict of interest existed since his advocate and the judge were both members of the same bar association. The court reasoned that although the judge was scheduled for transfer in June 2026, immediate transfer to another court was necessary for the smooth conduct of the interim relief proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the husband's application to transfer the pending Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) case from Judge V. M. Kolekar to another judge at Jaysingpur, accepting his concern that a potential conflict of interest existed since his advocate and the judge were both members of the same bar association. The court reasoned that although the judge was scheduled for transfer in June 2026, immediate transfer to another court was necessary for the smooth conduct of the interim relief proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case