Rajvardhan Suresh Bhumkar vs Nandkumar Rangrao Ghatage — 80/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHKO010033022025
e-Filing Number
17-09-2025
Filing Number
1448/2025
Filing Date
17-Sep-2025
Registration No
80/2025
Registration Date
26-Sep-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
9-District Judge-5, Kolhapur.
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajvardhan Suresh Bhumkar
Adv. BADI RAMESH RAMCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandkumar Rangrao Ghatage
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 80/2025 Summary: In this criminal revision petition between Rajvardhan Suresh Bhumkar (petitioner) and Nandkumar Rangrao Ghatage (respondent), the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur passed a "no say" order against the opponent on 11/05/2026. The respondent appeared through counsel on 11/02/2026 but failed to file his written submissions/reply till the date of order, resulting in the adverse "no say" order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
16-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
11-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
09-Dec-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
26-Nov-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
04-Oct-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
29-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 80/2025
Case 80/2025 Summary: In this criminal revision petition between Rajvardhan Suresh Bhumkar (petitioner) and Nandkumar Rangrao Ghatage (respondent), the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur passed a "no say" order against the opponent on 11/05/2026. The respondent appeared through counsel on 11/02/2026 but failed to file his written submissions/reply till the date of order, resulting in the adverse "no say" order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts