State of Maharashtra vs Bhaiyya alias Babasaheb Vilas Kamble Advocate - A. M. Chavan — 67/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,376,377. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act

CNR: MHKO010032032019

N.B.W._Ready

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1346/2019

Filing Date

01-08-2019

Registration No

67/2019

Registration Date

03-08-2019

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

337

Police Station

Police Station Shahupuri

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,376,377
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12
JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT Section 75

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Bhaiyya alias Babasaheb Vilas Kamble Advocate - A. M. Chavan

Hearing History

Judge: 30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

10-03-2026

N.B.W._Ready

09-01-2026

N.B.W._Ready

27-11-2025

N.B.W._Ready

16-10-2025

N.B.W._Ready

08-08-2025

Charge

Interim Orders

18-09-2019
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The accused was granted bail in C.R. No. 337/2019 (charges under IPC sections 363, 376, 377 and POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12) involving alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse of a 14-year-old minor. The court released him on personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, not pressurizing witnesses, staying within Kolhapur district, and attending court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The accused was granted bail in C.R. No. 337/2019 (charges under IPC sections 363, 376, 377 and POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12) involving alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse of a 14-year-old minor. The court released him on personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, not pressurizing witnesses, staying within Kolhapur district, and attending court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case