State of Maharashtra vs Rohan Sandip Kole — 175/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(I)(J)(N). Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHKO010028712022

N.B.W._Ready

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1407/2022

Filing Date

29-07-2022

Registration No

175/2022

Registration Date

30-07-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

367

Police Station

Police Station Karvir

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376(I)(J)(N)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section 3(1)(w)(i),(ii),3(2)(v)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Rohan Sandip Kole

Hearing History

Judge: 30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

10-03-2026

N.B.W._Ready

17-01-2026

N.B.W._Ready

03-12-2025

N.B.W._Ready

27-10-2025

N.B.W._Ready

07-10-2025

Charge

Interim Orders

16-09-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary Bail Granted: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the bail application of accused Rohan Sandip Kole, who was charged under IPC Section 376, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of a 15-year-8-month-old minor. The court found that given the victim's age of understanding, evidence suggesting consensual relations, completed investigation, and no criminal antecedents, detention was unjustified. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 personal and surety bonds with strict conditions including non-tampering of evidence and non-contact restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail Granted: The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the bail application of accused Rohan Sandip Kole, who was charged under IPC Section 376, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of a 15-year-8-month-old minor. The court found that given the victim's age of understanding, evidence suggesting consensual relations, completed investigation, and no criminal antecedents, detention was unjustified. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 personal and surety bonds with strict conditions including non-tampering of evidence and non-contact restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case