Kolhapur Jilha Rugnalaya Chatruth Kayam Nokaranchi Sah Soci. Thr Balasaheb Shamrao Kavale vs Resident Deputy Colletor Kolhapur Advocate - AGP — 128/2022
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010026722022
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
1590/2022
Filing Date
16-07-2022
Registration No
128/2022
Registration Date
18-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kolhapur Jilha Rugnalaya Chatruth Kayam Nokaranchi Sah Soci. Thr Balasaheb Shamrao Kavale
Adv. Manoj. M. Patil
Respondent(s)
Resident Deputy Colletor Kolhapur Advocate - AGP
Dean Chtrapati Pramilaraje Sarvpochar Rugnalaya, Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Court rejected the appellant's stay application (Exh.21) in Civil Appeal No.128/2022. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with previous court orders dated 03/08/2022, which required the appeal to be argued within three weeks—a condition that automatically vacated the earlier stay. The court deemed this non-compliance contempt of court and found no new grounds warranting relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court rejected the appellant's stay application (Exh.21) in Civil Appeal No.128/2022. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with previous court orders dated 03/08/2022, which required the appeal to be argued within three weeks—a condition that automatically vacated the earlier stay. The court deemed this non-compliance contempt of court and found no new grounds warranting relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts