Yogesh Canteen Prop. Sonali Anil Aawade vs Dean C.P. R. Hospital Kolhapur Advocate - AGP — 120/2022
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO010025762022
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
1518/2022
Filing Date
12-07-2022
Registration No
120/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Canteen Prop. Sonali Anil Aawade
Adv. R. P. Sadolikar
Respondent(s)
Dean C.P. R. Hospital Kolhapur Advocate - AGP
Resident Deputy Collector Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The District Court rejected the appellant's stay application in a civil appeal concerning an eviction order against a tea stall operator. The court found the application not maintainable as the appellant failed to comply with conditions imposed in an earlier stay order (dated 03/08/2022), which required the appeal to be argued within three weeks, after which the stay would automatically vacate. The previous eviction order has attained finality, and the appellant is not entitled to further protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The District Court rejected the appellant's stay application in a civil appeal concerning an eviction order against a tea stall operator. The court found the application not maintainable as the appellant failed to comply with conditions imposed in an earlier stay order (dated 03/08/2022), which required the appeal to be argued within three weeks, after which the stay would automatically vacate. The previous eviction order has attained finality, and the appellant is not entitled to further protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts