Rupa Pravin Waydande Prop. Pruthvi Juice Center vs Resident Deputy Collect Kolhapur Advocate - AGP — 116/2022
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010025702022
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
1514/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
116/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupa Pravin Waydande Prop. Pruthvi Juice Center
Adv. R. A. Mehta
Respondent(s)
Resident Deputy Collect Kolhapur Advocate - AGP
Dean C.P. R. Hospital Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Reg. Civil Appeal No.116/2022, the District Judge rejected the appellant's (Mrs. Rupa Pravin Waydande) application for stay/status-quo dated 18/01/2025. The Court found that the appellant failed to comply with its previous order dated 03/08/2022, which required the appeal's final hearing within three weeks, and has deliberately delayed proceedings for 2.5 years, constituting contempt of court. The stay application was deemed unmaintainable, and the automatic vacation of the earlier stay order remained in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Reg. Civil Appeal No.116/2022, the District Judge rejected the appellant's (Mrs. Rupa Pravin Waydande) application for stay/status-quo dated 18/01/2025. The Court found that the appellant failed to comply with its previous order dated 03/08/2022, which required the appeal's final hearing within three weeks, and has deliberately delayed proceedings for 2.5 years, constituting contempt of court. The stay application was deemed unmaintainable, and the automatic vacation of the earlier stay order remained in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts