Mussa Ibrahim Shaik Prop Chatrapati Pramilaraje Tea Stall vs Resident Deputy Collector Kolhapur Advocate - AGP — 115/2022
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010025692022
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
1513/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
115/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mussa Ibrahim Shaik Prop Chatrapati Pramilaraje Tea Stall
Adv. R. A. Mehta
Respondent(s)
Resident Deputy Collector Kolhapur Advocate - AGP
Dean Chatrapati Pramilaraje Sarvpochar Rugnalya Kolhapur Through Authorised Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Court of Kolhapur rejected the appellant's application for stay/status-quo in Civil Appeal No.115/2022. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with the previous court order dated 03/08/2022 requiring final arguments within three weeks, constituting contempt of court. The appellant had deliberately delayed proceedings for 2.5 years and raised no new grounds, making the application not tenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Court of Kolhapur rejected the appellant's application for stay/status-quo in Civil Appeal No.115/2022. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with the previous court order dated 03/08/2022 requiring final arguments within three weeks, constituting contempt of court. The appellant had deliberately delayed proceedings for 2.5 years and raised no new grounds, making the application not tenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts