Sadik Sikandar Sayyad Prop. S.S.T. Stall Center and Nashta Center vs Resident Deputy Collector Kolhapur — 114/2022
Case under Bombay Public Security Measures (Delhi Amendment) Act Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010025682022
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
1512/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
114/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sadik Sikandar Sayyad Prop. S.S.T. Stall Center and Nashta Center
Adv. R. A. Mehta
Respondent(s)
Resident Deputy Collector Kolhapur
Dean, Chatrapati Pramilaraje Sarvpochar Rugnalya Kolhapur through Authorised officer
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Court rejected the appellant's application for stay/status-quo in Civil Appeal No.114/2022 dated 18/01/2025. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with a previous order dated 03/08/2022 requiring final arguments within three weeks, and instead delayed proceedings for 2.5 years, constituting contempt of court. The stay order previously granted stands vacated, and the appellant's application at Exh.30 is hereby rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Court rejected the appellant's application for stay/status-quo in Civil Appeal No.114/2022 dated 18/01/2025. The court found the application unmaintainable as the appellant failed to comply with a previous order dated 03/08/2022 requiring final arguments within three weeks, and instead delayed proceedings for 2.5 years, constituting contempt of court. The stay order previously granted stands vacated, and the appellant's application at Exh.30 is hereby rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts