State of Maharashtra vs Nilesh Krushanat Torskar — 134/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHKO010024282025

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1059/2025

Filing Date

07-07-2025

Registration No

134/2025

Registration Date

07-07-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

Gokul Shiragaon Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(2)
Arms Act Section 5,25

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Nilesh Krushanat Torskar

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur

06-05-2026

Evidence

22-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Bail Application REJECTED The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected the bail application of Nilesh Krushnath Toraskar, accused of attempt to murder under BNS Sections 109, 351(2) and Arms Act Sections 5 & 25. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused came prepared with a sword and assaulted his mother-in-law on vital parts causing grievous injuries, with corroboration from independent witnesses. Citing the gravity of the offense, risk of evidence tampering, and witness intimidation, the court denied bail despite the accused's contentions of false implication and completion of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Application REJECTED The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected the bail application of Nilesh Krushnath Toraskar, accused of attempt to murder under BNS Sections 109, 351(2) and Arms Act Sections 5 & 25. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused came prepared with a sword and assaulted his mother-in-law on vital parts causing grievous injuries, with corroboration from independent witnesses. Citing the gravity of the offense, risk of evidence tampering, and witness intimidation, the court denied bail despite the accused's contentions of false implication and completion of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case