State of Maharashtra vs Swapanil Santosh Charapale Advocate - B. D. Rakhunde — 155/2020

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 8[c], 20. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Charge Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHKO010022282020

Filing Number

1107/2020

Filing Date

28-Aug-2020

Registration No

155/2020

Registration Date

29-Aug-2020

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

226

Police Station

Police Station Gandhinagar

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 8[c], 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Swapanil Santosh Charapale Advocate - B. D. Rakhunde

  2. 2.Akshay Namdeo Patil

  3. 3.Suraj Sambhaji Patil

  4. 4.Washim Abdulsattar Bandar

  5. 5.Tukaram Sakharam Jagtap @ Matkari

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  3. 21-Nov-2025

    Charge

  4. 28-Aug-2025

    Charge

  5. 20-May-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  6. 27-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  7. 13-Dec-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  8. 07-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  9. 08-Aug-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  10. 04-May-2024

    Charge

  11. 20-Feb-2024

    Charge

  12. 19-Dec-2023

    Charge

  13. 20-Oct-2023

    Charge

  14. 22-Aug-2023

    Charge

  15. 28-Jun-2023

    Charge

  16. 19-Apr-2023

    Charge

  17. 28-Feb-2023

    Charge

  18. 12-Jan-2023

    Charge

  19. 03-Dec-2022

    Charge

  20. 20-Oct-2022

    Charge

  21. 06-Sep-2022

    Charge

  22. 29-Jul-2022

    Charge

  23. 30-Jun-2022

    Charge

  24. 25-Apr-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  25. 23-Mar-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  26. 11-Feb-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  27. 06-Jan-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  28. 04-Dec-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  29. 11-Nov-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  30. 18-Oct-2021

    Filing of Vakilpatra

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  31. 17-Sep-2021

    Filing of Vakilpatra

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  32. 18-Aug-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  33. 23-Jun-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  34. 24-May-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  35. 10-May-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  36. 26-Apr-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  37. 31-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  38. 23-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  39. 16-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  40. 08-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  41. 05-Mar-2021

    Order on Exh

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  42. 03-Mar-2021

    Order on Exh

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  43. 23-Feb-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  44. 08-Feb-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  45. 18-Jan-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  46. 17-Dec-2020

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application for release of seized property under Section 457 Cr.P.C. was allowed partly. The court ordered release of the motorcycle (Registration No. MH-10-DE-1124) to the applicant on execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he shall not alter its structure, alienate it, or use it for crime until case conclusion. However, the application for release of the Samsung mobile handset was rejected due to risk of evidence tampering and data destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  47. 17-Dec-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  48. 14-Dec-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-2 Kolhapur

  49. 10-Dec-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  50. 09-Dec-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  51. 07-Dec-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  52. 27-Nov-2020

    Charge

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  53. 06-Nov-2020

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  54. 27-Oct-2020

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  55. 27-Oct-2020

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  56. 06-Oct-2020

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  57. 24-Sep-2020

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  58. 24-Sep-2020

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  59. 23-Sep-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  60. 15-Sep-2020

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  61. 11-Sep-2020

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  62. 29-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 28-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for release of seized property under Section 457 Cr.P.C. was allowed partly. The court ordered release of the motorcycle (Registration No. MH-10-DE-1124) to the applicant on execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he shall not alter its structure, alienate it, or use it for crime until case conclusion. However, the application for release of the Samsung mobile handset was rejected due to risk of evidence tampering and data destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case