State of Maharashtra vs Raju Alis Rajaram Bhikaji Tawade — 129/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),96,3. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHKO010020212025

Charge

Next Hearing

12th August 2026

e-Filing Number

04-06-2025

Filing Number

913/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

129/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

Police Station Kodoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),96,3
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8,12,17

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Raju Alis Rajaram Bhikaji Tawade

Supriya Himmat Powar

Adv. null

Manoj Ashok Sawant

Adv. null

Saheel Himmat Powar@Sujit

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 30-District Judge-4, Kolhapur

16-04-2026

Charge

16-03-2026

Production of Accused

07-01-2026

Production of Accused

16-12-2025

Production of Accused

10-12-2025

Production of Accused

Interim Orders

16-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

The application filed by third-party Pravin Bhimrao Pawar under Section 497 BNSS for return of his Toyota Innova car (seized in a POCSO case) was allowed. The court ordered release of the vehicle upon execution of a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot alter the car's structure or color, must produce it as directed, and the investigating officer must document its condition via photographs and panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The application filed by third-party Pravin Bhimrao Pawar under Section 497 BNSS for return of his Toyota Innova car (seized in a POCSO case) was allowed. The court ordered release of the vehicle upon execution of a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot alter the car's structure or color, must produce it as directed, and the investigating officer must document its condition via photographs and panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case