State of Maharashtra vs Abhishek Manjunath Mali — 91/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,143,147,148,149. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO010017192025
Filing Number
714/2025
Filing Date
03-May-2025
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
05-May-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
772
Police Station
Police Station Juna Rajwada
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhishek Manjunath Mali
-
2.Atul Subhash Shinde
-
3.Ajay Uraf Ravan Dagadu Shinde
-
4.Aakash Sanjay Mali Juvenail
-
5.Suraj Sanjay Mali Juvenail
-
6.Omkar Amar Mane Juvenail
Case History
-
15-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
20-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
18-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The successive bail application filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 (Abhishaikh Manjunath Mali and Atul Subhash Shinde) has been rejected. The court found that although the charge had not been framed at the time of the earlier bail rejection, the delay in evidence recording was not attributable to prosecution negligence but rather to procedural requirements. Considering the heinous nature of the offense (carrying maximum punishment), the circumstances including weapon recovery, and the prosecution's willingness to expeditiously complete the trial, the court deemed bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
17-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
16-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
11-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
09-Feb-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
27-Jan-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
12-Jan-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
29-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
23-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
16-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
12-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
04-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
12-Nov-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
27-Oct-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
22-Sep-2025
Charge
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
13-Aug-2025
Charge
-
23-Jul-2025
Charge
-
07-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
Charge
-
02-Jul-2025
Order on Exh
-
30-Jun-2025
Charge
-
25-Jun-2025
Charge
-
20-Jun-2025
Charge
-
16-Jun-2025
Charge
-
11-Jun-2025
Charge
-
19-May-2025
Appearance
District Judge-4, Kolhapur
-
05-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2025
Summary: The successive bail application filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 (Abhishaikh Manjunath Mali and Atul Subhash Shinde) has been rejected. The court found that although the charge had not been framed at the time of the earlier bail rejection, the delay in evidence recording was not attributable to prosecution negligence but rather to procedural requirements. Considering the heinous nature of the offense (carrying maximum punishment), the circumstances including weapon recovery, and the prosecution's willingness to expeditiously complete the trial, the court deemed bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts