State of Maharashtra vs Sandip Vilas Nerdar — 68/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,120B,327,341,143,147,149,427. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO010012562024
Filing Number
576/2024
Filing Date
26-Mar-2024
Registration No
68/2024
Registration Date
27-Mar-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Police Station Shahupuri
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sandip Vilas Nerdar
-
2.Babalu Alias Prasnnkumar Vishwasrao Nejdar
-
3.Yuvraj Bajirao Ulape
-
4.Nishikant Kisan Kamble
-
5.Dhanaji Balaso Godase
-
6.Pravin Vishwas Nejdar
-
7.Tushar Tukaram Nejdar
-
8.Kaustubh Alias Pushkraj Kamlakar Nejdar
-
9.Ajit Vilasrao Powar
-
10.Suhas Shivaji Namdev Ambi
-
11.Anant Hari Patil
-
12.Shreeprasad Sanjay Varale
-
13.Pravin Baburao Chougule
-
14.Dip Sunil Kondekar
-
15.Pappu Alias Prabhul Kamlakar Nejdar
-
16.Kunal Shivaji Nejdar
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
12-Dec-2025
Charge
-
26-Sep-2025
Charge
-
05-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
15-Mar-2025
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
07-Jan-2025
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
25-Oct-2024
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
29-Jul-2024
Charge
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
26-Apr-2024
Charge
-
23-Apr-2024
Charge
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Redmi mobile phone was allowed. Deep Sunil Kondekar was granted custody of the device on a Rs. 15,000 bond (Suprutnama), subject to conditions including data copying under panchnama, prohibition on material alterations or disposal without court permission, and production of the phone as directed. The court found that copying relevant data onto removable devices would serve trial purposes without requiring custody of the phone itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2024
Charge
-
20-Apr-2024
Order
-
18-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
10-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
08-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
02-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2024
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Redmi mobile phone was allowed. Deep Sunil Kondekar was granted custody of the device on a Rs. 15,000 bond (Suprutnama), subject to conditions including data copying under panchnama, prohibition on material alterations or disposal without court permission, and production of the phone as directed. The court found that copying relevant data onto removable devices would serve trial purposes without requiring custody of the phone itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts