Pruthviraj Sarjerao Chavan vs State of Maharshtra — 256/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010011282026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
489/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
Police Station Karvir
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pruthviraj Sarjerao Chavan
Adv. SHINDE SAGAR RAMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharshtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to applicant Pruthviraj Sarjerao Chavan, accused of offenses including making false marriage promises under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the FIR based on misinformation, as the victim was legally married to another person (Rupesh Khandekar) on the dates she claimed to be divorced, making her misrepresentation of marital status material. Bail was granted with personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and conditions restricting witness intimidation and requiring police station compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
06-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
02-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
25-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
20-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2026
The court granted bail to applicant Pruthviraj Sarjerao Chavan, accused of offenses including making false marriage promises under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the FIR based on misinformation, as the victim was legally married to another person (Rupesh Khandekar) on the dates she claimed to be divorced, making her misrepresentation of marital status material. Bail was granted with personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and conditions restricting witness intimidation and requiring police station compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts