Mohan Krishnat Wadkar vs Radhanagari Police Station by Maharashtra Government — 58/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 29th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO010010722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

472/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

0040

Police Station

Police Station Radhanagri.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Mohan Krishnat Wadkar

Adv. Geeta pritesh ingale

Respondent(s)

Radhanagari Police Station by Maharashtra Government

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur

29-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Hearing

23-04-2026

Hearing

16-04-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Mohan Krishnat Wadkar v. State of Maharashtra (Case 58/2026) The court granted Mohan Krishnat Wadkar's application for interim custody of his seized Piaggio pickup van, allowing return of the vehicle pending trial in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court reasoned that under precedent (Bishwajit Dey v. State of Assam), seized vehicles can only be confiscated after trial completion, and interim return serves justice interests. Vehicle custody was granted subject to conditions: Rs. 1,39,400 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mohan Krishnat Wadkar v. State of Maharashtra (Case 58/2026) The court granted Mohan Krishnat Wadkar's application for interim custody of his seized Piaggio pickup van, allowing return of the vehicle pending trial in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court reasoned that under precedent (Bishwajit Dey v. State of Assam), seized vehicles can only be confiscated after trial completion, and interim return serves justice interests. Vehicle custody was granted subject to conditions: Rs. 1,39,400 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case