Mohan Krishnat Wadkar vs Radhanagari Police Station by Maharashtra Government — 58/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 29th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO010010722026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
472/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
0040
Police Station
Police Station Radhanagri.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohan Krishnat Wadkar
Adv. Geeta pritesh ingale
Respondent(s)
Radhanagari Police Station by Maharashtra Government
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Disposed
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-04-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mohan Krishnat Wadkar v. State of Maharashtra (Case 58/2026) The court granted Mohan Krishnat Wadkar's application for interim custody of his seized Piaggio pickup van, allowing return of the vehicle pending trial in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court reasoned that under precedent (Bishwajit Dey v. State of Assam), seized vehicles can only be confiscated after trial completion, and interim return serves justice interests. Vehicle custody was granted subject to conditions: Rs. 1,39,400 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mohan Krishnat Wadkar v. State of Maharashtra (Case 58/2026) The court granted Mohan Krishnat Wadkar's application for interim custody of his seized Piaggio pickup van, allowing return of the vehicle pending trial in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court reasoned that under precedent (Bishwajit Dey v. State of Assam), seized vehicles can only be confiscated after trial completion, and interim return serves justice interests. Vehicle custody was granted subject to conditions: Rs. 1,39,400 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts