Nilesh Krushnat Shinde vs State of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station — 55/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO010010472026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
464/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
Police Station Panhala
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilesh Krushnat Shinde
Adv. ADV. PAWAR ULHAS PRALHAD
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Disposed
Order
Order
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 55/2026 The court allowed Nilesh Krushnat Shinde's application for return of his seized Splendor Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-09-EF-3377). The Additional Sessions Judge found that Shinde was the registered owner with valid insurance, and that prolonged police custody risked weather damage to the vehicle. The State raised no specific objections to the return. The court returned the motorcycle on conditions: execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on material alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 55/2026 The court allowed Nilesh Krushnat Shinde's application for return of his seized Splendor Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-09-EF-3377). The Additional Sessions Judge found that Shinde was the registered owner with valid insurance, and that prolonged police custody risked weather damage to the vehicle. The State raised no specific objections to the return. The court returned the motorcycle on conditions: execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on material alterations or sale without court permission, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts