Nitesh Maruti Kambale vs State of maharashtra through Anti corruption buero, kolhapur — 236/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 06th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010010192026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
450/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
236/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
Gokul Shiragaon Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitesh Maruti Kambale
Adv. Rohit Rajendra Kalekar
Respondent(s)
State of maharashtra through Anti corruption buero, kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Disposed
Order
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Order | |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 13-03-2026 | First Order | |
| 12-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Special (ACB) Judge, Kolhapur granted pre-arrest bail to accused Nitesh Maruti Kamble and Ijaj Mahammad Shaikh in a corruption case under sections 7A and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court found that the applicants had cooperated with the ACB investigation, material investigation was completed, and technical evidence was secured with the Forensic Laboratory, rendering the prosecution's concerns about evidence tampering moot. They were released on bail with conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, abstaining from threatening witnesses, and appearing before the Investigation Officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special (ACB) Judge, Kolhapur granted pre-arrest bail to accused Nitesh Maruti Kamble and Ijaj Mahammad Shaikh in a corruption case under sections 7A and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court found that the applicants had cooperated with the ACB investigation, material investigation was completed, and technical evidence was secured with the Forensic Laboratory, rendering the prosecution's concerns about evidence tampering moot. They were released on bail with conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, abstaining from threatening witnesses, and appearing before the Investigation Officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts