Amarsinh Ranjitsinh Patnkar vs Mangalprabhat Developers Prop Prarthana Nandish Seth Through POA Rakesh Mulchand Mehta — 55/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43 R 1(r) 104. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHKO010010152026

Notice_Unready

Next Hearing

24th July 2026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

674/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

10-District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43 R 1(r) 104

Petitioner(s)

Amarsinh Ranjitsinh Patnkar

Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH

Dipaksinh Ranjitsinh Patankar

Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH

Vikramsinh Ranjitsinh Patankar

Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH

Respondent(s)

Mangalprabhat Developers Prop Prarthana Nandish Seth Through POA Rakesh Mulchand Mehta

Hearing History

Judge: 10-District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

12-06-2026

Notice_Unready

18-04-2026

Notice_Unready

18-03-2026

Notice_Unready

17-03-2026

First Order

16-03-2026

First Order

Interim Orders

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: In M.C.A. No. 55/2026, an appeal was filed by Amarsing Ranjitsinh Patankar against Mangal Prabhat Development Properties under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC. The court issued notice to respondents (returnable 18/04/2026), accepted the appellant's power of attorney through Advocate G.G. Nanivadekar, filed one supporting document, and noted the appellant's address. The matter was adjourned pending respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In M.C.A. No. 55/2026, an appeal was filed by Amarsing Ranjitsinh Patankar against Mangal Prabhat Development Properties under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC. The court issued notice to respondents (returnable 18/04/2026), accepted the appellant's power of attorney through Advocate G.G. Nanivadekar, filed one supporting document, and noted the appellant's address. The matter was adjourned pending respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case