Amarsinh Ranjitsinh Patnkar vs Mangalprabhat Developers Prop Prarthana Nandish Seth Through POA Rakesh Mulchand Mehta — 55/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43 R 1(r) 104. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010010152026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
674/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
10-District Judge-6 Kolhapur.
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amarsinh Ranjitsinh Patnkar
Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH
-
2.Dipaksinh Ranjitsinh Patankar
Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH
-
3.Vikramsinh Ranjitsinh Patankar
Adv. NANIWADEKAR GAURAV GIRISH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mangalprabhat Developers Prop Prarthana Nandish Seth Through POA Rakesh Mulchand Mehta
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Notice_Unready
District Judge-6 Kolhapur.
-
18-Apr-2026
Notice_Unready
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: In M.C.A. No. 55/2026, an appeal was filed by Amarsing Ranjitsinh Patankar against Mangal Prabhat Development Properties under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC. The court issued notice to respondents (returnable 18/04/2026), accepted the appellant's power of attorney through Advocate G.G. Nanivadekar, filed one supporting document, and noted the appellant's address. The matter was adjourned pending respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
17-Mar-2026
First Order
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2026
Case Summary: In M.C.A. No. 55/2026, an appeal was filed by Amarsing Ranjitsinh Patankar against Mangal Prabhat Development Properties under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC. The court issued notice to respondents (returnable 18/04/2026), accepted the appellant's power of attorney through Advocate G.G. Nanivadekar, filed one supporting document, and noted the appellant's address. The matter was adjourned pending respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts