Kiran Shankar Hirve vs State Of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station — 229/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010009942026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
436/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Police Station Panhala
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kiran Shankar Hirve
Adv. HARSHA KHANDELWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 229/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Shankar Hirve and co-accused, finding the case suspicious as the deceased committed suicide in September 2023 but charges were registered over 3 years later. The court noted no specific dates for alleged caste abuses were mentioned in the FIR and ruled out the possibility that this was a civil money dispute given criminal color. Both applicants were released on Rs.25,000 personal bonds each with conditions against witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2026
Case 229/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Shankar Hirve and co-accused, finding the case suspicious as the deceased committed suicide in September 2023 but charges were registered over 3 years later. The court noted no specific dates for alleged caste abuses were mentioned in the FIR and ruled out the possibility that this was a civil money dispute given criminal color. Both applicants were released on Rs.25,000 personal bonds each with conditions against witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts