Kiran Shankar Hirve vs State Of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station — 229/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO010009942026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

436/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

229/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Police Station Panhala

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306,323,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1(r)(s.3(1)(2)(va),6

Petitioner(s)

Kiran Shankar Hirve

Adv. HARSHA KHANDELWAL

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra Through Panhala Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 229/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Shankar Hirve and co-accused, finding the case suspicious as the deceased committed suicide in September 2023 but charges were registered over 3 years later. The court noted no specific dates for alleged caste abuses were mentioned in the FIR and ruled out the possibility that this was a civil money dispute given criminal color. Both applicants were released on Rs.25,000 personal bonds each with conditions against witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 229/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Shankar Hirve and co-accused, finding the case suspicious as the deceased committed suicide in September 2023 but charges were registered over 3 years later. The court noted no specific dates for alleged caste abuses were mentioned in the FIR and ruled out the possibility that this was a civil money dispute given criminal color. Both applicants were released on Rs.25,000 personal bonds each with conditions against witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case