Rushikesh Mahadev Dhende vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Murgud Police Station — 215/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010009582026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
405/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
215/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rushikesh Mahadev Dhende
Adv. KALEKAR PRANIL PRATAPRAO
Sourabha Dinkar Kamble
Adv. KALEKAR PRANIL PRATAPRAO
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through Murgud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Disposed
Order
Order
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Kolhapur granted bail to accused Rushikesh Mahadev Dhende and Sourabh Dinkar Kamble in an extortion case involving threats related to alleged POCSO Act violations. The court found that despite serious allegations of extorting ₹15 lakhs through threats, the applicants' physical presence was no longer necessary for investigation as most evidence (call records, mobile phones, ₹14 lakhs recovered) had been collected, and they had been in judicial custody since February 2026. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal bonds each with strict conditions including biweekly police reporting and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Kolhapur granted bail to accused Rushikesh Mahadev Dhende and Sourabh Dinkar Kamble in an extortion case involving threats related to alleged POCSO Act violations. The court found that despite serious allegations of extorting ₹15 lakhs through threats, the applicants' physical presence was no longer necessary for investigation as most evidence (call records, mobile phones, ₹14 lakhs recovered) had been collected, and they had been in judicial custody since February 2026. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 personal bonds each with strict conditions including biweekly police reporting and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts