Sagar Khandu Kamble vs State Of Maharashtra — 214/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010009522026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
403/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
214/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
146
Police Station
Police Station Shahupuri
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Khandu Kamble
Adv. Harshwardhan avinash ratnakar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected Sagar Khandu Kamble's anticipatory bail application in a case involving allegations of physical assault, verbal abuse, and breach of modesty against a hotel receptionist. The court found the allegations grave—including slapping, punching, hair-pulling, and unwanted touching—with corroborating witness statements, and determined that denying bail was appropriate given the serious nature of offences under BNS sections 74, 79, 352, and 115(2) and the ongoing investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
06-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 214/2026
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected Sagar Khandu Kamble's anticipatory bail application in a case involving allegations of physical assault, verbal abuse, and breach of modesty against a hotel receptionist. The court found the allegations grave—including slapping, punching, hair-pulling, and unwanted touching—with corroborating witness statements, and determined that denying bail was appropriate given the serious nature of offences under BNS sections 74, 79, 352, and 115(2) and the ongoing investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts