Shri Prafull Himmatlal Padiya vs state of Maharashtra — 209/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(a),(b),(e),81,83,86,90,103. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010009262026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
398/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
209/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Police Station Shahuwadi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri Prafull Himmatlal Padiya
Adv. LOKHANDE SACHIN PANDIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 209/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Prafful Himmatlal Padiya and co-applicants charged with possessing 5,184 fake foreign liquor bottles under Maharashtra Prohibition Act and poisoning charges. The Additional Sessions Judge found that section 123 (administering poison) was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed, not administered, the liquor, and investigation was complete with no prior criminal records. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs.50,000 personal bond, monthly reporting to Excise Inspector, and evidence tampering restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
09-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 209/2026
Case 209/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Prafful Himmatlal Padiya and co-applicants charged with possessing 5,184 fake foreign liquor bottles under Maharashtra Prohibition Act and poisoning charges. The Additional Sessions Judge found that section 123 (administering poison) was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed, not administered, the liquor, and investigation was complete with no prior criminal records. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs.50,000 personal bond, monthly reporting to Excise Inspector, and evidence tampering restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts