Digvijay Rajaram Patil vs State of maharashtra — 204/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010008902026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
387/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
204/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Digvijay Rajaram Patil
Adv. SAIFALI KAZI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 204/2026 Summary: The court allowed Digvijay Rajaram Patil's bail application in a fake liquor possession case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123 (administering poison). The Additional Sessions Judge held that section 123 was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it, and that mere departmental opinion cannot establish the poisoning charge. With investigation completed and no criminal antecedents, the applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions including personal and cash bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
09-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 204/2026
Case 204/2026 Summary: The court allowed Digvijay Rajaram Patil's bail application in a fake liquor possession case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123 (administering poison). The Additional Sessions Judge held that section 123 was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it, and that mere departmental opinion cannot establish the poisoning charge. With investigation completed and no criminal antecedents, the applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions including personal and cash bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts