Digvijay Rajaram Patil vs State of maharashtra — 204/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO010008902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(b)(e),81,83,86,90,103
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123

Petitioner(s)

Digvijay Rajaram Patil

Adv. SAIFALI KAZI

Respondent(s)

State of maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

20-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

04-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 204/2026 Summary: The court allowed Digvijay Rajaram Patil's bail application in a fake liquor possession case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123 (administering poison). The Additional Sessions Judge held that section 123 was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it, and that mere departmental opinion cannot establish the poisoning charge. With investigation completed and no criminal antecedents, the applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions including personal and cash bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 204/2026 Summary: The court allowed Digvijay Rajaram Patil's bail application in a fake liquor possession case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123 (administering poison). The Additional Sessions Judge held that section 123 was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it, and that mere departmental opinion cannot establish the poisoning charge. With investigation completed and no criminal antecedents, the applicant was released on bail with stringent conditions including personal and cash bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case