Ravindra Suresh Sawant vs State of Maharashtra — 202/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010008882026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
385/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
202/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Police Station Panhala
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Suresh Sawant
Adv. PATIL LALASO BABU
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted bail to three applicants (Ravindra Sawant, Digvijay Rajaram Patil, and Prafful Himmatlal Padiya) arrested for possessing 5,184 fake liquor bottles. The court held that Section 123 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (administering poison) was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it to anyone. With completed investigation, no criminal antecedents, and stringent conditions imposed (Rs. 50,000 personal bond with sureties, monthly reporting to Excise Inspector), the applicants were released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted bail to three applicants (Ravindra Sawant, Digvijay Rajaram Patil, and Prafful Himmatlal Padiya) arrested for possessing 5,184 fake liquor bottles. The court held that Section 123 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (administering poison) was misapplied since the applicants merely possessed the fake liquor and did not administer it to anyone. With completed investigation, no criminal antecedents, and stringent conditions imposed (Rs. 50,000 personal bond with sureties, monthly reporting to Excise Inspector), the applicants were released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts