Adesh Sambhaji Dhokare vs State of Maharashtra — 193/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010008562026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
368/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
193/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Police Station Radhanagri.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Adesh Sambhaji Dhokare
Adv. Amit Ashok Mahadik
-
2.Sambhaji Banda Dhokare
Adv. Amit Ashok Mahadik
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Cri.Bail Application No. 193/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Adesh Sambhaji Dhokare and Sambhaji Banda Dhokare, who were charged with causing grievous injuries using weapons (sticks and sickles) in a land dispute incident on 20-02-2026. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense serious due to fracture injuries sustained on vital body parts, weapons seized, ongoing investigation, and the applicants' participation in armed confrontation at a government office despite being summoned for dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
06-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2026
Case Summary: Cri.Bail Application No. 193/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Adesh Sambhaji Dhokare and Sambhaji Banda Dhokare, who were charged with causing grievous injuries using weapons (sticks and sickles) in a land dispute incident on 20-02-2026. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense serious due to fracture injuries sustained on vital body parts, weapons seized, ongoing investigation, and the applicants' participation in armed confrontation at a government office despite being summoned for dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts