Malappa Saibana Hosmani vs State Of Maharashtra — 122/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010005962026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
229/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
277
Police Station
Police Station Juna Rajwada
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malappa Saibana Hosmani
Adv. PAWAR SANDEEP VASANTRAO
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Disposed
Order
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 122/2026 Summary: Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur. Hosmani was arrested for stealing ornaments worth Rs. 12,01,270 from a home on 18/04/2025 (Crime No. 277/2025, sections 305 & 331(4) BNS). The court found a prima facie case against him: stolen ornaments were recovered from a jeweler at his instance, and the jeweler identified him as having pledged them. The court rejected bail citing his criminal history and similar prior offences, determining substantial risk of reoffence if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 122/2026 Summary: Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur. Hosmani was arrested for stealing ornaments worth Rs. 12,01,270 from a home on 18/04/2025 (Crime No. 277/2025, sections 305 & 331(4) BNS). The court found a prima facie case against him: stolen ornaments were recovered from a jeweler at his instance, and the jeweler identified him as having pledged them. The court rejected bail citing his criminal history and similar prior offences, determining substantial risk of reoffence if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts