Malappa Saibana Hosmani vs State of Maharashtra — 120/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO010005902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

227/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

625

Police Station

Police Station Juna Rajwada

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a)

Petitioner(s)

Malappa Saibana Hosmani

Adv. PAWAR SANDEEP VASANTRAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application in a theft case (Crime No.625/2025). Though investigation was completed and he was chargesheeted, the court denied bail due to prima facie evidence of guilt—stolen gold ornaments were recovered from a jeweler after the applicant's disclosure—and his prior criminal history of similar offences pending at Pune, creating substantial risk of re-offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application in a theft case (Crime No.625/2025). Though investigation was completed and he was chargesheeted, the court denied bail due to prima facie evidence of guilt—stolen gold ornaments were recovered from a jeweler after the applicant's disclosure—and his prior criminal history of similar offences pending at Pune, creating substantial risk of re-offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case