Malappa Saibana Hosmani vs State of Maharashtra — 120/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010005902026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
227/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
625
Police Station
Police Station Juna Rajwada
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malappa Saibana Hosmani
Adv. PAWAR SANDEEP VASANTRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application in a theft case (Crime No.625/2025). Though investigation was completed and he was chargesheeted, the court denied bail due to prima facie evidence of guilt—stolen gold ornaments were recovered from a jeweler after the applicant's disclosure—and his prior criminal history of similar offences pending at Pune, creating substantial risk of re-offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
27-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
20-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
17-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
12-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur rejected Malappa Saibana Hosmani's bail application in a theft case (Crime No.625/2025). Though investigation was completed and he was chargesheeted, the court denied bail due to prima facie evidence of guilt—stolen gold ornaments were recovered from a jeweler after the applicant's disclosure—and his prior criminal history of similar offences pending at Pune, creating substantial risk of re-offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts