Ranjeet Prakash Kamable vs State of Maharashtra — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHKO010003252026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Police Station Shahuwadi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65ABDEF,81,83,92,103

Petitioner(s)

Ranjeet Prakash Kamable

Adv. TANAWADE SWATI BHIMRAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Order

27-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court rejected Ranjit Prakash Kamble's pre-arrest bail application in a fake liquor manufacturing case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123. The court found credible grounds connecting the applicant to the crime based on co-accused Jaydeep's interrogation revelation, the applicant's prior similar offense (Crime No.359/2025), and the necessity for physical custody to further investigation, dismissing the applicant's contention that the affidavit retracting the implication lacked legal force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Ranjit Prakash Kamble's pre-arrest bail application in a fake liquor manufacturing case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and BNS Section 123. The court found credible grounds connecting the applicant to the crime based on co-accused Jaydeep's interrogation revelation, the applicant's prior similar offense (Crime No.359/2025), and the necessity for physical custody to further investigation, dismissing the applicant's contention that the affidavit retracting the implication lacked legal force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case