State of Maharashtra vs Kiran Manik Jangam Advocate - Jayendra V. Patil — 25/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304B,498A,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

Sessions Case

CNR: MHKO010002842021

Filing Number

126/2021

Filing Date

21-Jan-2021

Registration No

25/2021

Registration Date

22-Jan-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

32-District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

348

Police Station

Police Station Vadgaon

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304B,498A,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. एस. एम. पाटील

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Manik Jangam Advocate - Jayendra V. Patil

  2. 2.Manik Vasant Jangam

    Adv. Jayendra V. Patil

  3. 3.Sunita Manik Jangam

    Adv. Jayendra V. Patil

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-4, Kolhapur

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-4, Kolhapur

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

  11. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  12. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  13. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  14. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  15. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  16. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  17. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  18. 12-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  19. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  20. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  21. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  22. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  23. 10-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  24. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  25. 17-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  26. 10-May-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  27. 24-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  28. 17-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  29. 23-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  30. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  31. 27-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Kolhapur.

  32. 23-May-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  33. 11-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  34. 09-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  35. 10-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  36. 18-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  37. 22-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  38. 28-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  39. 25-Aug-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  40. 13-Jul-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-7 Kolhapur.

  41. 12-May-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  42. 30-Apr-2021

    Charge

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  43. 23-Apr-2021

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  44. 16-Apr-2021

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  45. 06-Apr-2021

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  46. 05-Apr-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Kiran Manik Jangam & Others (S.C. No. 25/2021) Accused No. 2 (Manik Vasant Jangam), the father-in-law of deceased Jyoti, was granted bail on April 5, 2021. The case involved charges under IPC Sections 304-B (causing death by negligence) and 498-A (cruelty to wife) for alleged harassment leading to the deceased's suicide within 4 months of marriage. The court found insufficient direct evidence against the accused, noting the suicide note's wording "I am sorry all of you KJ love" and that the deceased committed suicide 8 days after leaving the matrimonial home, suggesting no role by the accused. Bail was granted on executing bonds of Rs. 15,000 with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  47. 05-Apr-2021

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  48. 31-Mar-2021

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-6 Kolhapur.

  49. 17-Mar-2021

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

  50. 16-Mar-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  51. 16-Mar-2021

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

  52. 04-Mar-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

  53. 26-Feb-2021

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Kolhapur

  54. 10-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 21-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Kiran Manik Jangam & Others (S.C. No. 25/2021) Accused No. 2 (Manik Vasant Jangam), the father-in-law of deceased Jyoti, was granted bail on April 5, 2021. The case involved charges under IPC Sections 304-B (causing death by negligence) and 498-A (cruelty to wife) for alleged harassment leading to the deceased's suicide within 4 months of marriage. The court found insufficient direct evidence against the accused, noting the suicide note's wording "I am sorry all of you KJ love" and that the deceased committed suicide 8 days after leaving the matrimonial home, suggesting no role by the accused. Bail was granted on executing bonds of Rs. 15,000 with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case