NAGESH VILASRAO CHOUGALE(Legal Heir) vs NIVRUTTI KRUSHNA NIRMALE — 9/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 43 RULE 1 (R). Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO010001152026
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
81/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGESH VILASRAO CHOUGALE(Legal Heir)
Adv. S S Kestikar1.
JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE
Adv. S S Kestikar1.
ARADHYA NAGESH CHOUGALE THROUGH MOTHER JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE
Adv. S S Kestikar1.
ARNAV NAGESH CHOUGALE THROUGH MOTHER JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE
Adv. S S Kestikar
GANESH SHANKARRAO CHOUGLAE
Adv. S S Kestikar
Respondent(s)
NIVRUTTI KRUSHNA NIRMALE
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.9/2026 challenging the temporary injunction order dated 01-01-2026 is rejected. The court declined to grant ex-parte injunction against respondents 1-18, finding the mortgage deeds lack sufficient boundary descriptions to determine which portion of the property was mortgaged, creating ambiguity. Notices are issued to respondents with return date 10-02-2026, and exemption/stay is allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.9/2026 challenging the temporary injunction order dated 01-01-2026 is rejected. The court declined to grant ex-parte injunction against respondents 1-18, finding the mortgage deeds lack sufficient boundary descriptions to determine which portion of the property was mortgaged, creating ambiguity. Notices are issued to respondents with return date 10-02-2026, and exemption/stay is allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts