NAGESH VILASRAO CHOUGALE(Legal Heir) vs NIVRUTTI KRUSHNA NIRMALE — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 43 RULE 1 (R). Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHKO010001152026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

81/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur

Judge

3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 43 RULE 1 (R)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGESH VILASRAO CHOUGALE(Legal Heir)

    Adv. S S Kestikar1.

  2. 2.JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE

    Adv. S S Kestikar1.

  3. 3.ARADHYA NAGESH CHOUGALE THROUGH MOTHER JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE

    Adv. S S Kestikar1.

  4. 4.ARNAV NAGESH CHOUGALE THROUGH MOTHER JYOTI NAGESH CHOUGALE

    Adv. S S Kestikar

  5. 5.GANESH SHANKARRAO CHOUGLAE

    Adv. S S Kestikar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIVRUTTI KRUSHNA NIRMALE

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3, Kolhapur.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.9/2026 challenging the temporary injunction order dated 01-01-2026 is rejected. The court declined to grant ex-parte injunction against respondents 1-18, finding the mortgage deeds lack sufficient boundary descriptions to determine which portion of the property was mortgaged, creating ambiguity. Notices are issued to respondents with return date 10-02-2026, and exemption/stay is allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.9/2026 challenging the temporary injunction order dated 01-01-2026 is rejected. The court declined to grant ex-parte injunction against respondents 1-18, finding the mortgage deeds lack sufficient boundary descriptions to determine which portion of the property was mortgaged, creating ambiguity. Notices are issued to respondents with return date 10-02-2026, and exemption/stay is allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case