State of Maharashtra vs Kapil Bhagwan Patale — 1/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,311,61(2),3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO010000542026
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Police Station Radhanagri.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Kapil Bhagwan Patale
Abhijeet Maruti Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3, Kolhapur.
Charge
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 11-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 24-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: Both bail applications filed by Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been rejected. The court found sufficient evidence linking the applicants to a murder case (Crime No. 259/2025, Radhanagari PS, Kolhapur), including recovery of gold ornaments at Abhijit's instance, an extra-judicial confession, witness statements placing Kapil near the crime scene, and his absence from the Ganesh procession during the critical time period. Given the serious nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Both bail applications filed by Abhijit Maruti Patil and Kapil Bhagwan Patale under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been rejected. The court found sufficient evidence linking the applicants to a murder case (Crime No. 259/2025, Radhanagari PS, Kolhapur), including recovery of gold ornaments at Abhijit's instance, an extra-judicial confession, witness statements placing Kapil near the crime scene, and his absence from the Ganesh procession during the critical time period. Given the serious nature of the offence, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts