State of Maharashtra vs Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan Advocate - ZOL H. D. — 351/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,354,143,147,149,148,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHJN110042232021

Filing Number

817/2021

Filing Date

25-Mar-2021

Registration No

351/2021

Registration Date

25-Mar-2021

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad

Judge

2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

386

Police Station

Ambad

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,354,143,147,149,148,323,504,506
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(R)(S)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan Advocate - ZOL H. D.

  2. 2.Naserkhan Nyajukhan Pathan

  3. 3.Najerkhan @ Munnakhan Nyajukhan Pathan

  4. 4.Sayyad Salman Chand

  5. 5.Taufik Chand Sayyad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan & Others (351/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad convicted all five accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307), rioting (§148), and unlawful assembly (§143). They were acquitted of sexual assault, insult, and SC/ST atrocity charges. Key Facts: On August 9, 2020, five Muslim men assaulted a Chambhar (SC caste) farmer with axes and sticks over an agricultural land dispute, causing grievous head injuries. The injured man's wife suffered minor injuries when her blouse was torn during the attack. Reasoning: The court found the eyewitness testimony of the injured farmer and his wife credible and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of weapons. Minor inconsistencies didn't undermine their accounts. However, the court rejected allegations of caste-based abuse occurring "in chorus" as inherently improbable and insufficient evidence for SC/ST atrocity charges. Sentences: Each accused received 5 years imprisonment for attempt to murder plus concurrent sentences for rioting and unlawful assembly, with fines totaling ₹7,000 per person. ₹30,000 compensation ordered to the injured victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  13. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  19. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  20. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  22. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  23. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  24. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  25. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  26. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  27. 26-Sep-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  28. 28-Aug-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  29. 06-Aug-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  30. 21-Jun-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  31. 10-May-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  32. 02-Apr-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  33. 20-Feb-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  34. 16-Jan-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  35. 19-Dec-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  36. 21-Nov-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad

  37. 23-Oct-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  38. 05-Aug-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  39. 16-May-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  40. 28-Feb-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  41. 06-Dec-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  42. 14-Sep-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  43. 13-Jul-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  44. 17-May-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  45. 25-Feb-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  46. 24-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  47. 18-Dec-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  48. 29-Sep-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  49. 29-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  50. 25-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 25-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 351/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan & Others (351/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad convicted all five accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307), rioting (§148), and unlawful assembly (§143). They were acquitted of sexual assault, insult, and SC/ST atrocity charges. Key Facts: On August 9, 2020, five Muslim men assaulted a Chambhar (SC caste) farmer with axes and sticks over an agricultural land dispute, causing grievous head injuries. The injured man's wife suffered minor injuries when her blouse was torn during the attack. Reasoning: The court found the eyewitness testimony of the injured farmer and his wife credible and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of weapons. Minor inconsistencies didn't undermine their accounts. However, the court rejected allegations of caste-based abuse occurring "in chorus" as inherently improbable and insufficient evidence for SC/ST atrocity charges. Sentences: Each accused received 5 years imprisonment for attempt to murder plus concurrent sentences for rioting and unlawful assembly, with fines totaling ₹7,000 per person. ₹30,000 compensation ordered to the injured victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case