State of Maharashtra vs Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan Advocate - ZOL H. D. — 351/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,354,143,147,149,148,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 04th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHJN110042232021
Filing Number
817/2021
Filing Date
25-03-2021
Registration No
351/2021
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
FIR Details
FIR Number
386
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan Advocate - ZOL H. D.
Naserkhan Nyajukhan Pathan
Najerkhan @ Munnakhan Nyajukhan Pathan
Sayyad Salman Chand
Taufik Chand Sayyad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan & Others (351/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad convicted all five accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307), rioting (§148), and unlawful assembly (§143). They were acquitted of sexual assault, insult, and SC/ST atrocity charges. Key Facts: On August 9, 2020, five Muslim men assaulted a Chambhar (SC caste) farmer with axes and sticks over an agricultural land dispute, causing grievous head injuries. The injured man's wife suffered minor injuries when her blouse was torn during the attack. Reasoning: The court found the eyewitness testimony of the injured farmer and his wife credible and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of weapons. Minor inconsistencies didn't undermine their accounts. However, the court rejected allegations of caste-based abuse occurring "in chorus" as inherently improbable and insufficient evidence for SC/ST atrocity charges. Sentences: Each accused received 5 years imprisonment for attempt to murder plus concurrent sentences for rioting and unlawful assembly, with fines totaling ₹7,000 per person. ₹30,000 compensation ordered to the injured victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nyajukhan Yashimkhan Pathan & Others (351/2021) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad convicted all five accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307), rioting (§148), and unlawful assembly (§143). They were acquitted of sexual assault, insult, and SC/ST atrocity charges. Key Facts: On August 9, 2020, five Muslim men assaulted a Chambhar (SC caste) farmer with axes and sticks over an agricultural land dispute, causing grievous head injuries. The injured man's wife suffered minor injuries when her blouse was torn during the attack. Reasoning: The court found the eyewitness testimony of the injured farmer and his wife credible and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of weapons. Minor inconsistencies didn't undermine their accounts. However, the court rejected allegations of caste-based abuse occurring "in chorus" as inherently improbable and insufficient evidence for SC/ST atrocity charges. Sentences: Each accused received 5 years imprisonment for attempt to murder plus concurrent sentences for rioting and unlawful assembly, with fines totaling ₹7,000 per person. ₹30,000 compensation ordered to the injured victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts