Sagar Ganpat Khaire vs Dattatraya Uttamrao Khaire Advocate - TAYDE R.N. — 32/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 3H,4. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHJN110040942021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
32/2019
Filing Date
22-02-2021
Registration No
32/2019
Registration Date
22-02-2021
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagar Ganpat Khaire
Adv. BANKAR S.N.
Respondent(s)
Dattatraya Uttamrao Khaire Advocate - TAYDE R.N.
Sanjay Uttamrao Khaire
Gangubai Fakira Kamble
Parubai Uttamrao Khaire
Shankar Ganpat Khaire
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Issues
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Issues |
| 30-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 30-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sagar Ganpat Khaire v. Dattatraya Uttamrao Khaire (LAR No. 32/2019) Outcome: The court rejected the application filed by third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference. The District Judge found that the applicants, claiming to be legal heirs of deceased Laxman Sakharam, lacked standing because they failed to file objections before the Acquiring Authority when the land was acquired for National Highway No. 52, and the acquisition award was not passed in their names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sagar Ganpat Khaire v. Dattatraya Uttamrao Khaire (LAR No. 32/2019) Outcome: The court rejected the application filed by third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference. The District Judge found that the applicants, claiming to be legal heirs of deceased Laxman Sakharam, lacked standing because they failed to file objections before the Acquiring Authority when the land was acquired for National Highway No. 52, and the acquisition award was not passed in their names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts