Baburao Rangnath Kambale vs State of Maharashtra through Police Station Gondi Advocate - APP — 258/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 26th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN110005242026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
378/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
258/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
Gondi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baburao Rangnath Kambale
Adv. JOSHI P V
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Police Station Gondi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
-
2.Victim XYZ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case 258/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of 76-year-old Baburao Rangnath Kamble, accused of sexually abusing an 11-year-old girl under sections 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 115, 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, 2012. The court found the allegations serious—the accused allegedly lured the victim away from her siblings and committed indecent acts—and held that given the investigation's primary stage, releasing him posed risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
25-May-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
22-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 258/2026
Case 258/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of 76-year-old Baburao Rangnath Kamble, accused of sexually abusing an 11-year-old girl under sections 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 115, 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, 2012. The court found the allegations serious—the accused allegedly lured the victim away from her siblings and committed indecent acts—and held that given the investigation's primary stage, releasing him posed risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts