Amol Nandu Kharat vs State of Maharashtra Through Station Ambad Advocate - APP — 233/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 28th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN110004912026
e-Filing Number
12-05-2026
Filing Number
345/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Decision Date
28-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
256
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amol Nandu Kharat
Adv. TARDE A.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Station Ambad Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 233/2026 The court rejected Amol Nandu Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a bank gold theft case involving Rs. 96 lacs of stolen gold. The court found that investigation officer's allegations—that Kharat received stolen gold from the main accused, mortgaged it for a loan, and helped hide the remaining gold—warranted custodial interrogation to recover the missing gold and establish the truth. The Additional Sessions Judge ruled that pre-arrest bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses and investigative necessity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
-
26-May-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
-
25-May-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
-
22-May-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
-
20-May-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Case Summary: 233/2026 The court rejected Amol Nandu Kharat's anticipatory bail application in a bank gold theft case involving Rs. 96 lacs of stolen gold. The court found that investigation officer's allegations—that Kharat received stolen gold from the main accused, mortgaged it for a loan, and helped hide the remaining gold—warranted custodial interrogation to recover the missing gold and establish the truth. The Additional Sessions Judge ruled that pre-arrest bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses and investigative necessity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts