Mahesh Ashok Yevle vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP — 117/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHJN110002432026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Ambad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),189,190,191(2),191(3),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Ashok Yevle

    Adv. MUNDLIK S.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Mahesh Ashok Yevle's bail application in a stabbing case, finding him insufficiently implicated in the FIR and supplementary statement—neither mentioned his presence at the incident or any overt acts by him, with allegations focusing only on another accused (Rahul Khare). The court granted bail with conditions including a Rs.25,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, no witness intimidation, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Mahesh Ashok Yevle's bail application in a stabbing case, finding him insufficiently implicated in the FIR and supplementary statement—neither mentioned his presence at the incident or any overt acts by him, with allegations focusing only on another accused (Rahul Khare). The court granted bail with conditions including a Rs.25,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, no witness intimidation, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case