Shivprasad Arun Hire vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP — 116/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN110002382026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivprasad Arun Hire
Adv. MASKE A. A.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Disposed
Arguments
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shivprasad Arun Hire vs State of Maharashtra (Cri. Bail Appln. 116/2026) The court granted bail to accused Shivprasad Arun Hire, finding credible evidence of afterthought allegations. The FIR lodged by the informant (father of deceased Pawan Borate) made no mention of the accused's presence or involvement, naming only Rahul Khare as the perpetrator. The court noted that allegations against Hire appeared only in the supplementary statement recorded the same day, suggesting fabrication rather than genuine eyewitness account. Hire was released on ₹25,000 PR bond with strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-intimidation of witnesses, cooperation with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shivprasad Arun Hire vs State of Maharashtra (Cri. Bail Appln. 116/2026) The court granted bail to accused Shivprasad Arun Hire, finding credible evidence of afterthought allegations. The FIR lodged by the informant (father of deceased Pawan Borate) made no mention of the accused's presence or involvement, naming only Rahul Khare as the perpetrator. The court noted that allegations against Hire appeared only in the supplementary statement recorded the same day, suggesting fabrication rather than genuine eyewitness account. Hire was released on ₹25,000 PR bond with strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-intimidation of witnesses, cooperation with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts