Govind Bharatsingh Kakas vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN110002192026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
92
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govind Bharatsingh Kakas
Adv. PAWSE Ravindra D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: Govind Bharatsingh Kakas v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 6/2026) The court rejected the applicant's petition for release of a seized Ashok Leyland tipper truck, holding that he was not entitled to custody as the non-registered owner of the vehicle involved in a fatal accident case. The court found that the vehicle lacked valid insurance on the accident date (17-02-2026) and that releasing it could compromise compensation claims for deceased victims' legal heirs and create unauthorized third-party interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
16-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Summary: Govind Bharatsingh Kakas v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 6/2026) The court rejected the applicant's petition for release of a seized Ashok Leyland tipper truck, holding that he was not entitled to custody as the non-registered owner of the vehicle involved in a fatal accident case. The court found that the vehicle lacked valid insurance on the accident date (17-02-2026) and that releasing it could compromise compensation claims for deceased victims' legal heirs and create unauthorized third-party interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts