Govind Bharatsingh Kakas vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN110002192026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
92
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govind Bharatsingh Kakas
Adv. PAWSE Ravindra D.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Ambad Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addtional Sessions Judge, Ambad
Disposed
Arguments
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Govind Bharatsingh Kakas v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 6/2026) The court rejected the applicant's petition for release of a seized Ashok Leyland tipper truck, holding that he was not entitled to custody as the non-registered owner of the vehicle involved in a fatal accident case. The court found that the vehicle lacked valid insurance on the accident date (17-02-2026) and that releasing it could compromise compensation claims for deceased victims' legal heirs and create unauthorized third-party interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Govind Bharatsingh Kakas v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 6/2026) The court rejected the applicant's petition for release of a seized Ashok Leyland tipper truck, holding that he was not entitled to custody as the non-registered owner of the vehicle involved in a fatal accident case. The court found that the vehicle lacked valid insurance on the accident date (17-02-2026) and that releasing it could compromise compensation claims for deceased victims' legal heirs and create unauthorized third-party interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts