Sagar Ganpat Khaire vs Parubai Uttam Khaire Advocate - DESHMUKH S. K. — 167/2017

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 30. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHJN110000072017

Issues

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

1012/2017

Filing Date

22-02-2021

Registration No

167/2017

Registration Date

22-02-2021

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

Sagar Ganpat Khaire

Adv. TAYDE R.N.

Respondent(s)

Parubai Uttam Khaire Advocate - DESHMUKH S. K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad

06-04-2026

Issues

30-03-2026

Order on Exh

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

09-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

30-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: LAR No. 167/2017 Outcome: The application filed by the third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference has been rejected. Key Facts: The third-party applicants sought to be added as necessary parties, claiming they were legal heirs of their deceased father Laxman Sakharam who had ancestral rights in land (gat No. 93) that was acquired for National Highway No. 52. They argued their father's name had been deleted from revenue records and thus they did not receive acquisition notice. Court's Reasoning: The District Judge held that the applicants failed to file any objection before the Acquiring Authority at the time of acquisition or when the Award was passed. Since they were not parties to the original Award and the land was acquired following due procedure, non-parties cannot challenge the Award. The applicants also lacked documentary proof of their interest in the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LAR No. 167/2017 Outcome: The application filed by the third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference has been rejected. Key Facts: The third-party applicants sought to be added as necessary parties, claiming they were legal heirs of their deceased father Laxman Sakharam who had ancestral rights in land (gat No. 93) that was acquired for National Highway No. 52. They argued their father's name had been deleted from revenue records and thus they did not receive acquisition notice. Court's Reasoning: The District Judge held that the applicants failed to file any objection before the Acquiring Authority at the time of acquisition or when the Award was passed. Since they were not parties to the original Award and the land was acquired following due procedure, non-parties cannot challenge the Award. The applicants also lacked documentary proof of their interest in the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case