Sagar Ganpat Khaire vs Parubai Uttam Khaire Advocate - DESHMUKH S. K. — 167/2017
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 30. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHJN110000072017
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1012/2017
Filing Date
22-02-2021
Registration No
167/2017
Registration Date
22-02-2021
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court , Ambad
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagar Ganpat Khaire
Adv. TAYDE R.N.
Respondent(s)
Parubai Uttam Khaire Advocate - DESHMUKH S. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ambad
Issues
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Issues |
| 30-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 30-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAR No. 167/2017 Outcome: The application filed by the third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference has been rejected. Key Facts: The third-party applicants sought to be added as necessary parties, claiming they were legal heirs of their deceased father Laxman Sakharam who had ancestral rights in land (gat No. 93) that was acquired for National Highway No. 52. They argued their father's name had been deleted from revenue records and thus they did not receive acquisition notice. Court's Reasoning: The District Judge held that the applicants failed to file any objection before the Acquiring Authority at the time of acquisition or when the Award was passed. Since they were not parties to the original Award and the land was acquired following due procedure, non-parties cannot challenge the Award. The applicants also lacked documentary proof of their interest in the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LAR No. 167/2017 Outcome: The application filed by the third-party applicants seeking to be added as parties to the land acquisition reference has been rejected. Key Facts: The third-party applicants sought to be added as necessary parties, claiming they were legal heirs of their deceased father Laxman Sakharam who had ancestral rights in land (gat No. 93) that was acquired for National Highway No. 52. They argued their father's name had been deleted from revenue records and thus they did not receive acquisition notice. Court's Reasoning: The District Judge held that the applicants failed to file any objection before the Acquiring Authority at the time of acquisition or when the Award was passed. Since they were not parties to the original Award and the land was acquired following due procedure, non-parties cannot challenge the Award. The applicants also lacked documentary proof of their interest in the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts