Bank of Maharashtra vs Ramprasad Namdev Surve — 203/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 08th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN100009112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-04-2025

Filing Number

313/2025

Filing Date

24-07-2025

Registration No

203/2025

Registration Date

24-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

Bank of Maharashtra

Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT

Respondent(s)

Ramprasad Namdev Surve

Mahadev Narayan Awchar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

08-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Defence Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Ramprasad Namdev Surve and Mahadev Narayan Awchar (203/2025) The court held that respondents owe Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,05,767/- for an agricultural loan disbursed on 27/09/2018 under the Maharashtra Kisan Credit Card scheme. While the bank sought 12% interest, the court awarded only 6% per annum interest (instead of the contractual 12%) on the outstanding amount from the date of the suit filing until full repayment, reasoning that agricultural loans should not attract punitive interest rates typically applied to commercial debts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Ramprasad Namdev Surve and Mahadev Narayan Awchar (203/2025) The court held that respondents owe Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,05,767/- for an agricultural loan disbursed on 27/09/2018 under the Maharashtra Kisan Credit Card scheme. While the bank sought 12% interest, the court awarded only 6% per annum interest (instead of the contractual 12%) on the outstanding amount from the date of the suit filing until full repayment, reasoning that agricultural loans should not attract punitive interest rates typically applied to commercial debts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case