Bank of Maharashtra vs Ramprasad Namdev Surve — 203/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100009112025
e-Filing Number
13-04-2025
Filing Number
313/2025
Filing Date
24-07-2025
Registration No
203/2025
Registration Date
24-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of Maharashtra
Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT
Respondent(s)
Ramprasad Namdev Surve
Mahadev Narayan Awchar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Ramprasad Namdev Surve and Mahadev Narayan Awchar (203/2025) The court held that respondents owe Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,05,767/- for an agricultural loan disbursed on 27/09/2018 under the Maharashtra Kisan Credit Card scheme. While the bank sought 12% interest, the court awarded only 6% per annum interest (instead of the contractual 12%) on the outstanding amount from the date of the suit filing until full repayment, reasoning that agricultural loans should not attract punitive interest rates typically applied to commercial debts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Ramprasad Namdev Surve and Mahadev Narayan Awchar (203/2025) The court held that respondents owe Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,05,767/- for an agricultural loan disbursed on 27/09/2018 under the Maharashtra Kisan Credit Card scheme. While the bank sought 12% interest, the court awarded only 6% per annum interest (instead of the contractual 12%) on the outstanding amount from the date of the suit filing until full repayment, reasoning that agricultural loans should not attract punitive interest rates typically applied to commercial debts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts