Bank of Maharashtra vs Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle — 181/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100008452025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
282/2025
Filing Date
14-Jul-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
14-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank of Maharashtra
Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle (181/2025) The court decreed that the defendants must pay Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,03,515/- with interest at 6% per annum (p.a.) from the date of filing until full settlement, reducing the bank's claimed 11.90% rate. The court found the defendants defaulted on an agricultural term loan disbursed on 28/10/2014 and awarded the bank recovery with partial interest relief, citing that agricultural loans warrant lower interest rates than commercial loans under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 181/2025
Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle (181/2025) The court decreed that the defendants must pay Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,03,515/- with interest at 6% per annum (p.a.) from the date of filing until full settlement, reducing the bank's claimed 11.90% rate. The court found the defendants defaulted on an agricultural term loan disbursed on 28/10/2014 and awarded the bank recovery with partial interest relief, citing that agricultural loans warrant lower interest rates than commercial loans under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts