Bank of Maharashtra vs Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle — 181/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN100008452025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-05-2025

Filing Number

282/2025

Filing Date

14-07-2025

Registration No

181/2025

Registration Date

14-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

Bank of Maharashtra

Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT

Respondent(s)

Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

04-05-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

21-02-2026

Defence Evidence

11-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle (181/2025) The court decreed that the defendants must pay Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,03,515/- with interest at 6% per annum (p.a.) from the date of filing until full settlement, reducing the bank's claimed 11.90% rate. The court found the defendants defaulted on an agricultural term loan disbursed on 28/10/2014 and awarded the bank recovery with partial interest relief, citing that agricultural loans warrant lower interest rates than commercial loans under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bank of Maharashtra v. Nivrutti Bhagwanrao Ingle (181/2025) The court decreed that the defendants must pay Bank of Maharashtra Rs. 4,03,515/- with interest at 6% per annum (p.a.) from the date of filing until full settlement, reducing the bank's claimed 11.90% rate. The court found the defendants defaulted on an agricultural term loan disbursed on 28/10/2014 and awarded the bank recovery with partial interest relief, citing that agricultural loans warrant lower interest rates than commercial loans under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case