Ganesh Janardhan Kulkarni vs Saraswatibai Pralhad Rathod Advocate - NIMBALKAR D.S. — 1100053/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Suitforpossession. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100003482011
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1100053/2011
Filing Date
28-09-2011
Registration No
1100053/2011
Registration Date
28-09-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Janardhan Kulkarni
Adv. DESHPANDE A.R.
Respondent(s)
Saraswatibai Pralhad Rathod Advocate - NIMBALKAR D.S.
Anusayabai Haribhau Rathod
Pramod Pralhad Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Saraswatibai (RCS 53/2011) Outcome: Application rejected (19 November 2024) Defendants sought court-ordered re-measurement of disputed land (Gat No. 1) and adjoining properties, alleging the previous measurement by T.I.L.R. Mantha was conducted in collusion with the plaintiff. The court rejected this application, finding that a joint measurement had already been properly conducted by D.I.L.R. Jalna in 2019, which found defendants encroached 54-59 rupees of the plaintiff's land. The judge determined that further re-measurement would serve no evidentiary purpose, waste court time, and merely constitute an attempt to prolong litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Saraswatibai (RCS 53/2011) Outcome: Application rejected (19 November 2024) Defendants sought court-ordered re-measurement of disputed land (Gat No. 1) and adjoining properties, alleging the previous measurement by T.I.L.R. Mantha was conducted in collusion with the plaintiff. The court rejected this application, finding that a joint measurement had already been properly conducted by D.I.L.R. Jalna in 2019, which found defendants encroached 54-59 rupees of the plaintiff's land. The judge determined that further re-measurement would serve no evidentiary purpose, waste court time, and merely constitute an attempt to prolong litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts