Ramappa Nagnathappa Kapase vs Pushpa Dhondiba Kapase Advocate - CHAVAN P. D. — 44/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,39. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100002372025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2025
Filing Number
78/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
04-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramappa Nagnathappa Kapase
Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT
Respondent(s)
Pushpa Dhondiba Kapase Advocate - CHAVAN P. D.
Harshada Dhondiram KapaseRepresented by Guardian - Pushpa W/o Dhondiba Kapse
Shivhari Nagnathappa Kapaseq
Kantabai Laxman Patil
Shakuntala Dagdappa Kapase
Kailas Dagdappa Kapase
Meera Mahesh Chincholkar
Surekha Vijay Didhate
Ratnamala Ramling Tarate
Manohar Gangadharappa Kapase
Adv. CHAVAN P. D.,DESHPANDE A.R.
Abasaheb Gangadharppa Kapase
Adv. CHAVAN P. D.,DESHPANDE A.R.
Dhondibai Baban Kapase
Suryakant Baban Alias Babasaheb Kapase
Sunil Baban Alias Babasaheb Kapase
Sunita Atulappa Modiwale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 04-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 24-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 02-08-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 44/2025 - Ramappa Nagnathappa Kapase v. Pushpa Dhondiba Kapase & Others The court allowed the application filed by Respondents 10 and 11 seeking condonation of delay in filing their written reply. The court found that while Respondent 10 is an advocate and Respondent 11 faced unavailability of necessary documents, the delay warranted condonation given the substantive nature of the case. The court ordered: (1) Application of Respondents 10 and 11 is granted; (2) Respondents 10 and 11 are directed to pay a cost of Rs. 100/- each. Written reply of Respondents 10 and 11 is accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 44/2025 - Ramappa Nagnathappa Kapase v. Pushpa Dhondiba Kapase & Others The court allowed the application filed by Respondents 10 and 11 seeking condonation of delay in filing their written reply. The court found that while Respondent 10 is an advocate and Respondent 11 faced unavailability of necessary documents, the delay warranted condonation given the substantive nature of the case. The court ordered: (1) Application of Respondents 10 and 11 is granted; (2) Respondents 10 and 11 are directed to pay a cost of Rs. 100/- each. Written reply of Respondents 10 and 11 is accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts