Devgirini Nagari Sah Pat Mantha vs Sambhaji Shivaji Zol — 68/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN100001132026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Devgirini Nagari Sah Pat Mantha

    Adv. LIMBULKAR DHANANJAY SAKHARAMPANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sambhaji Shivaji Zol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: SCC No. 68/2026 The National Lok Adalat panel disposed of this cheque bounce case (Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition, stating the accused had paid the disputed amount. The court acquitted accused Sambhaji Shivaji Zol and ordered refund of court fees, finding no reason to continue proceedings once the complainant no longer wished to pursue the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 68/2026 The National Lok Adalat panel disposed of this cheque bounce case (Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition, stating the accused had paid the disputed amount. The court acquitted accused Sambhaji Shivaji Zol and ordered refund of court fees, finding no reason to continue proceedings once the complainant no longer wished to pursue the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case