Mohd Isaq Ahmed Hussain vs Mohammad Hassham Ahemad Hussain — 81/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN090006592025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-07-2025
Filing Number
163/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
81/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur
Judge
5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohd Isaq Ahmed Hussain
Adv. KATE BADRINATH MUNJABHAU
Mohd Irfan Mohd Isaq
Adv. KATE BADRINATH MUNJABHAU
Mohd Sadiq Ahemad Qureshi
Adv. KATE BADRINATH MUNJABHAU
Mohd. Ayub Ahmed Hussain
Adv. KATE BADRINATH MUNJABHAU
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Hassham Ahemad Hussain
Shaikh Mateen Shaikh Ibrahim
Nasimabano @ Nasimbee Mohd Matin
Shaikh Mobin Shaikh Matin
Shaikh Mujeeb Shaikh Matin
Mujjamil Khalil Sayyed
Subhash Vithalrao Sadguru
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 31-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 81/2025 The court allowed the petitioners' application with costs. The court permitted respondents 4 and 5 to file a written reply to the petition, noting they had not previously submitted one despite receiving notice, and imposed a cost of Rs. 300/- as a penalty for the delay. Respondents 4 and 5 were directed to pay this cost to the petitioners by the next scheduled date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 81/2025 The court allowed the petitioners' application with costs. The court permitted respondents 4 and 5 to file a written reply to the petition, noting they had not previously submitted one despite receiving notice, and imposed a cost of Rs. 300/- as a penalty for the delay. Respondents 4 and 5 were directed to pay this cost to the petitioners by the next scheduled date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts