Santosh Digambar Chavhan vs Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J. — 97/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN090004892022

Steps

Next Hearing

04th August 2026

Filing Number

144/2022

Filing Date

14-07-2022

Registration No

97/2022

Registration Date

14-07-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur

Judge

5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Santosh Digambar Chavhan

Adv. KULKARNI SUSHIL S.

Sanjay Digambar Chavhan

Satish Digambar Chavhan

Respondent(s)

Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J.

Sunil Radhakisan Chavhan

Pushpabai Appasaheb Chavhan

Pandit Jagannath Chavhan

Kalyan Jagannath Chavhan

Tukaram Bapurao Vitore

Pandurang Bapurao Vitore

Jagannath Rangnath Kubre

Arjun Harichandra Dongre

Sharda Baban Chavhan

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

08-06-2026

Steps

16-03-2026

Compliance

21-01-2026

Compliance

25-11-2025

Compliance

10-10-2025

Compliance

Interim Orders

08-06-2023
Order on T.I.
17-07-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case