Santosh Digambar Chavhan vs Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J. — 97/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

Steps Next hearing 04-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN090004892022

Filing Number

144/2022

Filing Date

14-Jul-2022

Registration No

97/2022

Registration Date

14-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur

Judge

5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Digambar Chavhan

    Adv. KULKARNI SUSHIL S.

  2. 2.Sanjay Digambar Chavhan

  3. 3.Satish Digambar Chavhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J.

  2. 2.Sunil Radhakisan Chavhan

  3. 3.Pushpabai Appasaheb Chavhan

  4. 4.Pandit Jagannath Chavhan

  5. 5.Kalyan Jagannath Chavhan

  6. 6.Tukaram Bapurao Vitore

  7. 7.Pandurang Bapurao Vitore

  8. 8.Jagannath Rangnath Kubre

  9. 9.Arjun Harichandra Dongre

  10. 10.Sharda Baban Chavhan

Case History

  1. 04-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  7. 30-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  8. 08-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  9. 09-May-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  11. 04-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  12. 18-Jan-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  13. 10-Dec-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  14. 15-Oct-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  15. 30-Jul-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  16. 25-Jun-2024

    Compliance

    Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C.

  17. 03-Apr-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  18. 07-Feb-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  19. 08-Jan-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  20. 01-Nov-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  21. 16-Sep-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  22. 16-Aug-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  23. 17-Jul-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 17-Jul-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 17-Jul-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  26. 13-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  27. 11-Jul-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  28. 22-Jun-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  29. 08-Jun-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  30. 08-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  31. 04-May-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  32. 26-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  33. 12-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  34. 24-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  35. 14-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  36. 10-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  37. 08-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  38. 22-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  39. 15-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  40. 30-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  41. 20-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  42. 03-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  43. 14-Dec-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  44. 06-Dec-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  45. 03-Dec-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  46. 14-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  47. 11-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  48. 06-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  49. 05-Aug-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

  50. 18-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 14-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case