Santosh Digambar Chavhan vs Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J. — 97/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN090004892022
Next Hearing
04th August 2026
Filing Number
144/2022
Filing Date
14-07-2022
Registration No
97/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur
Judge
5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Digambar Chavhan
Adv. KULKARNI SUSHIL S.
Sanjay Digambar Chavhan
Satish Digambar Chavhan
Respondent(s)
Amol Radhakisan Chavhan Advocate - KHADKE S.J.
Sunil Radhakisan Chavhan
Pushpabai Appasaheb Chavhan
Pandit Jagannath Chavhan
Kalyan Jagannath Chavhan
Tukaram Bapurao Vitore
Pandurang Bapurao Vitore
Jagannath Rangnath Kubre
Arjun Harichandra Dongre
Sharda Baban Chavhan
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Steps
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 21-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 25-11-2025 | Compliance |
| 10-10-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 97/2022 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court vacated the petitioners' (Santosh, Sanjay, and Satish Digambar Chavhan) appeal against the earlier order on Civil Rule 5. Key Points: The petitioners sought relief regarding land in Nanegaon, Tal. Banappuor, District Ratnagiri, claiming the respondents were obstructing their possession and constructing an unauthorized road. However, the court found that: (1) an order was previously passed on Civil Rule 5 in the original case; (2) the petitioners failed to challenge that order through proper appellate procedure in higher courts; (3) seeking the same relief repeatedly in the same court is not permissible under law. The court determined the petition fell outside the court's jurisdiction and dismissed it accordingly (17.07.2023). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts