pravin Ashokrao Joshi vs Anita Ashokrao Joshi — 38/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,1,2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN090002702018
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
48/2018
Filing Date
25-05-2018
Registration No
38/2018
Registration Date
25-05-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur
Judge
5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
pravin Ashokrao Joshi
Adv. Dhakane R.B.
Respondent(s)
Anita Ashokrao Joshi
Sau. Prajakta Shripad Joshi
Prashant Ashokrao Joshi
Bhausaheb Ramrao Jadhav
Sonaji Kisan Giri
Babasaheb Bhaurao Sonwane
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 38/2018 The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit involves partition of ancestral property where defendant no. 4 transferred 60 guntha land to a third party (Babasaheb Bhaurao Sonawane) via registered sale deed no. 2039/18 during the suit's pendency (sale executed 29/5/2018, four days after suit filing on 25/5/2018). The court found the plaintiff's proposed amendment necessary and timely, as the alienation occurred after suit institution and the plaintiff may not have been immediately aware of the transaction. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended plaint within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 38/2018 The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit involves partition of ancestral property where defendant no. 4 transferred 60 guntha land to a third party (Babasaheb Bhaurao Sonawane) via registered sale deed no. 2039/18 during the suit's pendency (sale executed 29/5/2018, four days after suit filing on 25/5/2018). The court found the plaintiff's proposed amendment necessary and timely, as the alienation occurred after suit institution and the plaintiff may not have been immediately aware of the transaction. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended plaint within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts