Ramdas Bakaram Palsakar vs Vishnu Bakaram Palaskar Advocate - ARSUD P.K. — 43/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN090002382017
Filing Number
56/2017
Filing Date
02-05-2017
Registration No
43/2017
Registration Date
02-05-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur
Judge
5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramdas Bakaram Palsakar
Adv. NAIK S. V.
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Bakaram Palaskar Advocate - ARSUD P.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge at Badnapur accepted the plaintiff Ramdas's withdrawal petition and dismissed the suit seeking partition, possession, and injunction of the disputed property against defendant Vishnu. The court found that since the plaintiff's purpose had been fulfilled and he no longer wished to proceed, continuing the suit would serve no purpose, and accordingly closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Civil Judge at Badnapur accepted the plaintiff Ramdas's withdrawal petition and dismissed the suit seeking partition, possession, and injunction of the disputed property against defendant Vishnu. The court found that since the plaintiff's purpose had been fulfilled and he no longer wished to proceed, continuing the suit would serve no purpose, and accordingly closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts